@@@@@@@@@@
Group B-8 ‰»Šw\‘’@(Chemical Structure)  
œ N-sec-Butyl-N-(1-acetoxymethyl) nitrosamine
@
CAS: 56986-37-9 @Laboratory @MW: 174.20
@
CA CHL/IU  Min ( 0.03 mg/ml, -S9), 24h
›
1)
1) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal@Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998)  (Tables in English)

œ N-Butyl-N-(acetylaminomethyl) nitrosamine
@  
64005-58-9@Laboratory@@ 173.21
CA CHL/IU  Max ( 4.0 mg/ml, -S9), 24-48h  (No data for +S))
 
1)
1) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal@Aberration Test i In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998)   (Tables in English)

œ n -Butyl acrylate in-ƒuƒ`ƒ‹ƒAƒNƒŠƒŒ[ƒgj
@@  
141-32-2@@Industrial @@128.17
AM Sal  Max ( 0.03-2.0 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1, 2)
CAv CH/Rat/BM  Max ( 820 ppm, 5-6h, ih, for 4d)
 
3)
1) Waegemaekers THJM & Bensink MPM: Mtation Res., 137, 95-102 (1984)
2) IARC Monograph, Vol 39, pp.67 (1986)
3) Engelhardt G & Klimisch HJ: Fundam. Appl. Toxicol.., 3, 640-641 (1983)

US-NTP Genotoxicity Screening:
›@Ames Test :@
 
›@CA Test with CHO cells:@
›
›@SCE Test with CHO Cells: @
›
›@SLRL Test with Drosophila:@
 

œ
n -Butylamine in-ƒuƒ`ƒ‹ƒAƒ~ƒ“j

@@
109-73-9@@Industry@ 73.14

  US-NTP Genotoxicity Screening:

   ›@Ames Test :
@ 

œtert-Butylamine itert-ƒuƒ`ƒ‰ƒ~ƒ“j@(2-methyl-2-propanamine)
@   75-64-9@Industry@73.14
AM Sal/E.coli Max ( 2.5 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.) Suppl. 2 (2000)   (Tables in English)
œ Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA)
@@
25013-16-5@Industry/Food@ 180.25
AM Sal  Max (?)
 
1, 6)
REC B.subtilis  Min (?)
›
2)
CA CHL/IU  Max ( 0.06 mg/ml, -S9), 24-48h
 
3)
CA DON  Max ( 10-4 M)   4)
SCE DON  Max ( 10-4 M)   4)
MNv Mice  Max ( 250 mg/kg x 4, ip), 24h
 
5)
1) Ishidate MJr., et al., Mutagens & Toxicity, Vol. 12, 82-90 (1980) (in Japanese)
2) Kawachi T, et al: in IARC Sci. Pub., Lyon, 323-330 (1980)
3)
Ishidate MJr. (Ed.): Data Book of ChromosomeAberration Test in vitro LIC/Tokyo & Elsevier/Amsterdam (1988)
4) Abe S & Sasaki M: J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 58, 1635-1641 (1977)
5) Hayashi M, et al: Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 26, 487-500 (1988)
6) Fujita H. et al., Ann. Rep. Tokyo Metr. Res., Lab. P.H. 36, 413-417 (1985) (in Japanese)

US-NTP Genotoxicity ScreeningF
› Ames TestF@ 
› Mouse Lymphoma Assay (L-5178Y)G@›
› CA Test with CHO CellsF@ 
› SCE Test with CHO Cells:F@ 


œButylated hydroxytoluene (
BHT)
(2,6 Dibutyl-p-cresol)

@   
128-37-0@Industry/Food@ 180.25
AM Sal  Max (?)
 
1)
REC B. subtilis  Max (?)
 
2)
CA CHL/IU  Max ( 0.05 mg/ml, }S9), 6-18h
 
3, 4)
CA DON  Max i0.001Mj
 
5)
MNv Mice  Max (?)
 
6)
1) Ishidate MJr.(Ed.): Data Book of Mutagenicity Tests on Chemicals in Bacteria, LIC/Tokyo, pp.74 (1991) (Tables in English)
2) Kawachi T, et al,: In IARC Sci., Pub., Lyon, 323-330 (1980)
3) Ishidate MJr. & Odashima S.: Mtution Res., 48, 377-354 (1977
4) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test i In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998)  (Tables in English)
5) Abe S. & Sasaki M.: J. Natl Cancer Inst., 58, 1635-1641(1977)
6) Natl Inst. Hygien. Sci., Tokyo (?
)

  US-NTP Genotoxicity ScreeningF
› Ames TestF@ 
› Mouse Lymphoma Assay (L-5178Y)G@›
› CA Test with CHO CellsF@ 
› SCE Test with CHO Cells:F@ 

@@
 IARC Carcinogenicity Criteria
@Group 3@
iNot classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humansj
œ p-tert-Butylbenzoic acid ip-tert-ƒuƒ`ƒ‹ˆΐ‘§Ž_j
     98-73-7@  Industry@ 178.23
AM Sal  Max ( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.) Suppl. 3, pp. 144 (2005)  (Tables in English)

œn-tert-Butyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide (N-(tert-ƒuƒ`ƒ‹j-2-ƒxƒ“ƒ]ƒ`ƒAƒ][ƒ‹ƒXƒ‹ƒtƒFƒ“ƒAƒ~ƒhj
@@
95-31-8@@Industry@ 238.39

AM Sal.  Max ( 2.5 mg/ml, }S9)
 
1)
CA CHL/IU  Max ( 0.4 mg/ml, +S9), 6-18h@
’
1)
AM Sal./ E coli  Max (@.5 mg/ml, }S9)   2)
MLA L5178Y  Min@( 40ƒΚ‚‡/ml, -S9), for 4h › 2)
MLA L5178Y  Min  ( 50 ƒΚ‚‡/ml, -S9), for 4h  › 3)
CA CHO  Max ( 10 ƒΚ‚‡/ml), for 2h   2)
CT Balb/3T3  Min@( 35ƒΚ‚‡/ml), for 3d › 2)
1) Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare, Japan: Tox. Test. Rep. of Environ. Chem., Vol. 5,  pp.157 (1997)  (Tables in English)
2
) Hinderer RK., et al., Environ. Mutagen., 5, 193-215 (1983)
3) Monsanto, EPA Doc. No. 88-920004696, NTIS OTSO543011 (1992)
œButyl benzyl phthalate (ƒuƒ`ƒ‹ƒxƒ“ƒWƒ‹ƒtƒ^ƒŒ[ƒgj(ƒtƒ^ƒ‹Ž_n-ƒuƒ`ƒ‹ƒxƒ“ƒWƒ‹j
@@
85-68-7@Industry@
312.4
AM Sal.  Max ( 10 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
AM Sal.  Max ( 1 mg/plate, }S9)
 
2)
MLA L5178Y  Max ( 1.2 ƒΚl/ml, }S9), for 4h
 
3)
MLA L5178Y  Max ( 100 nl/ml, }S9), for 4h
 
4)
CA CHO  Max ( 1.2 mg/ml, }S9), for 12h   5)
SCE CHO  Max ( 1.2 mg/ml, }S9), for 26h   5)
DNA E. coli  Max ( 30 mg/plate, -S9), for 26h   6)
CT Balb/C 3T3  Max ( 0.16ƒΚl/ml, -S9), for 3 days   3)
CAv Mice, BM  Max ( 5g/kg, ip,),  for 36h
 
7)
SCEv Rats, BM  Max ( 5g/kg, ip,),  for 36h   7)
MNv Rats, BM  Max ( 5g/kg, ip,),  for 36h   8)
SLRLv Drosophila  Max ( 50000 ppm, fed,,)   9)
1) Zeiger E., et al., Environ. Mutagen., 7, 213-232 (1985)
2) Kozumbo WJ., et al., Environ. Health Perspect., 43, 103-109 (1982)
3) Barber ED., et al., J. App;. Toxicol., 20, 69-80 (2000)
4) Myhr BL & Caspary WJ, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 18, 51-83 (1991)

5) Galloway EM., et al., Environ. Mol.. Mutagen., 10, 1-175 (1987)
6) Omori Y, Environ. Health. Perspect., 17, 203-209 (2000)
7) US NTP, TR 458, NIH Pub., No. 97-3374 (1997)
8) Ashby J., et al., Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 56, 107-118 (1997)
9) Valencia R., et al., Environ. Mutagen., 7, 325-348 (1985)

(Additional Ref.)
1) Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDS), U.S. Natl Lib. Med. (1996)
2) IARC, Monog. on the Evaluation of the Carcino. Risk of Chem. to Human, 29, 193-201 (1982)
3) J.  American College of Toxicol., 11 (1), 1-23 (1992)

yNotez
@(Cited from CICADS Document,  17,  1999)
   In the (few) published reports of Ames assays with BBP, results have been negative (Litton Bionetics Inc., 1976; Rubin et al., 1979; Kozumbo et al., 1982; Zeiger et al., 1982, 1985). Negative results have also been reported for mouse lymphoma assays (Litton Bionetics Inc., 1977; Hazleton Biotechnologies Company, 1986), although equivocal findings have also been published (Myhr et al., 1986; Myhr & Caspary, 1991). In an assay for in vitro transformation of Balb/c-3T3 cells (Litton Bionetics Inc., 1985), results were negative. In an assay for chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells (Galloway et al., 1987), there was slight evidence for a trend in one sister chromatid exchange test without activation, but no convincing evidence for positive results for sister chromatid exchanges or aberrations. Conversion factor: 1 ppm in food = 0.13 mg/kg body weight per day (Health Canada, 1994).
   The results from the mouse lymphoma (Myhr et al., 1986; Myhr & Caspary, 1991) and chromosomal aberration (Galloway et al., 1987) assays are equivocal. For the mouse lymphoma assay, the NTP concluded that "Increases in mutant colonies were observed in the absence of S9 in cultures treated with concentrations that produced precipitation, but such responses were not considered valid by experimental quality control parameters." However, it is difficult to dismiss the observed dose-response in several studies as spurious, although the repeat tests were negative, particularly in view of inconsistencies of results of the latter. In repeat studies ( n = 5) in the absence of S9, there was limited evidence of activity in only one case; however, although BBP was positive at 80 nl/ml in the second trial, it was toxic at concentrations above 30 nl/ml in the third. The inconsistently observed increase in small colony mutants and percent damaged Chinese hamster ovary cells may be indicative of weak clastogenic activity, which warrants proper confirmation in well-conducted assays.
    A negative response was reported for an assay for the induction of sex-linked recessive lethals in Drosophila melanogaster (Valencia et al., 1985). Recently, the NTP (1997) published summary results of mouse bone marrow tests for sister chromatid exchanges and induction of chromosomal aberrations; responses were weak, and the sister chromatid exchange test was not repeated. Both of these responses, although statistically significant, were small and indicative of only weak clastogenic activity. Ashby et al. (1997) reported negative results in a micronucleus assay in rats.

References

ELitton Bionetics Inc. (1976) Mutagenicity evaluation of BIO-76-17Santicizer 160. NB 259784.Final report. Submitted by Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO, to Office of Toxic Substances, US Environmental Protection Agency (Document Identification No. 87-7800282; Microfiche No. OTS200290).
ELitton Bionetics Inc. (1977) Mutagenicity evaluation of BIO-76-243CP731 (Santicizer 160) in the mouse lymphoma assay.Final report. Submitted by Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO, to Office of Toxic Substances, US Environmental Protection Agency (Document Identification No. 87-7800282; Microfiche No. OTS200290).
ELitton Bionetics Inc. (1985) Evaluation of 1D in the in vitro transformation of BALB/3T3 cells assay. Final report. Submitted by Chemical Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC, to US Environmental Protection Agency (Document Identification No. 40+8526206; Microfiche No. OTS0509537).
;ERubin RJ, Kozumbo W, Kroll R (1979) Ames mutagenic assay of a series of phthalic acid esters: positive response of the dimethyl and diethyl esters in TA100 [abstract]. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 48 (1 Part 2):A133.
EKozumbo WJ, Kroll R, Rubin RJ (1982) Assessment of the mutagenicity of phthalate esters. Environmental health perspectives, 45:103-109.
;EZeiger E, Haworth S, Speck W, Mortelmans K (1982) Phthalate ester testing in the National Toxicology Program's Environmental Mutagenesis Test Development Program. Environmental health perspectives, 45:99-101.
EZeiger E, Haworth S, Mortelmans K, Speck W (1985) Mutagenicity testing of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and related chemicals in Salmonella.Environmental mutagenesis, 7(2):213-232.
EHazleton Biotechnologies Company (1986) Mutagenicity of 1D in amouse lymphoma mutation assay.Final report. Submitted by Chemical Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC, to Office of Toxic Substances, US Environmental Protection Agency (Document Identification No. 40-8626225; Microfiche No. OTS0510527).
EMyhr BC, Bowers LR, Caspary WJ (1986) Results from the testing of coded chemicals in the L5178Y TK+/- mouse lymphoma mutagenesis assay [abstract]. Environmental mutagenesis, 8 (Suppl. 6) :58.
EMyhr BC, Caspary WJ (1991) Chemical mutagenesis at the thymidine kinase locus in L1578Y mouse lymphoma cells: results for 31 coded compounds in the National Toxicology Program. Environmental andmolecular mutagenesis, 18(1): 51-83. .
EGalloway SM, Armstrong MJ, Reuben C, Colman S, Brown B, Cannon C, Bloom AD, Nakamura F, Ahmed M, Duk S, Rimpo J, Margolin BH, Resnick MA, Anderson B, Zeiger E (1987) Chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells: evaluations of 108 chemicals. Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 10 (Suppl. 10): 1-175.
EHealth Canada (1994) Human health risk assessment for PrioritySubstances. Canada Communications Group, Ottawa, Ontario.
EValencia R, Mason JM, Woodruff RC, Zimmering S (1985) Chemical mutagenesis testing in Drosophila. III. Results of 48 coded compounds tested for the National Toxicology Program. Environmentalmutagenesis, 7(3): 325-348.
ENTP (1997a) Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of butyl benzylphthalate (CAS No. 85-68-7) in F344/N rats (feed studies). Research Triangle Park, NC, National Institutes of Health, National Toxicology Program (NTP Technical Report No. 458; NIH Publication No. 97-3374).
EAshby J, Tinwell H, Lefevre PA, Odum J, Paton D, Millward SW, Tittensor S, Brooks AN (1997a) Normal sexual development of rats exposed to butyl benzyl phthalate from conception to weaning. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 26: 102-118.

œ Butylbutanolamine iƒuƒ`ƒ‹ƒuƒ^ƒm[ƒ‹ƒAƒ~ƒ“j
@    
4543-95-7@Laboratory@ 145.24

AM Sal Max (?)@
 
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 0.40 mg/ml, -9), 24-48h
 
3)
1) Natl Inst. Hygien. Sci., Tokyo (?)
2) Ishidate MJr. (Ed.): Data Book of ChromosomeAberration Test In Vitro, LIC/Tokyo & Elsevier/Amsterdam (1988)

œ Butylbutanolnitrosoamine iƒuƒ`ƒ‹ƒuƒ^ƒm[ƒ‹ƒjƒgƒƒTƒAƒ~ƒ“j
@    
3817-11-6 @Laboratory@ 174.24

AM Sal Min (?)
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.9 mg/ml,+9),  3-12h
›
2)
1) Natl Inst. Hygien. Sci., Tokyo (?)
2) Ishidate MJr. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC/Tokyo & Elsevier/Amsterdam (1988)

œ N-Butyl-N-(3-carboxypropyl) nitrosamine
@   
38252-74-3@Laboratory@ 188.26

AM Sal Min (?)
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 1.0 mg/ml, -S9), 24-48h@iNo data for +S9)
’
2)
1)) Natl Inst. Hygien. Sci., Tokyo (?)
2) Ishidate MJr. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC/Tokyo & Elsevier/Amsterdam (1988)
œ 6-tert-Butyl-m-cresol i6-tert-ƒuƒ`ƒ‹-m-ƒNƒŒƒ][ƒ‹j
88-60-8 @Industry@@146.25
AM Sal Max ( 0.2 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1),
CA CHL Max ( 0.015 mg/ml, +S9) 6-18h
’
1)
1) Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare, Japan (Ed.) Tox. Test. Rep. of Environ. Chem., Vol. 7 (1999) (Tables in English)

œTop Page@iƒgƒbƒvƒy[ƒWj
œAbbreviation @iΘ—ͺ‹L†j@
œMutagenicity i•ΟˆΩŒ΄«j
œTest Systems@(ŽŽŒ±–@‚ΜŽν—ށj
œTechnical Problems@i‹Zp“I–β‘θ“_j
œList of@Compoundsi‰»‡•¨ƒŠƒXƒgj
œEvaluation of Results@iŽŽŒ±Œ‹‰Κ‚Μ•]‰Ώj