@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Group D-12 ‰»Šw\‘’@(Chemical Structure)  

œ Dioctyl phthalate
iƒWƒIƒNƒ`ƒ‹ƒtƒ^ƒ‰[ƒgj
@@@CASF117-81-7@Industry@@MW: 390.56
AM Sal./E. coli Max ( 5.0 mg/ml, }S9)   1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 0.5 mg/ml, -S9), 24-48h
 
2)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.), pp. 189 (1996) (Tables in EnglishI
2)
Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)

œ Diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI)  
(Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate) *
   
101-68-8 (4C4'-MDI)  @Industry@@ 250.26

yNotez@(Cited from CICADs Documents 27,  2001)

   When the mutagenicity of isomers and homologues of MDI (4,4f-MDI, 2,4f-MDI, a mixture of monomeric MDI isomers, and PMDI) was determined in the Salmonella/microsome test using DMSO and ethyleneglycol dimethyl ether (EGDE) as solvents, positive results were obtained for DMSO solutions of all four diisocyanates in the presence of S9 mix containing 30% S9 fraction. Uniformly negative results were found when the diisocyanates were dissolved in EGDE (Andersen et al., 1980; Herbold, 1980a,b; Woolrich, 1982; Shimizu et al., 1985; Zeiger, 1987; Herbold et al., 1998). MDI is not stable in DMSO, there being many products generated within minutes (Herbold, 1990; Gahlmann, 1993). Thus, it seems that positive test results in any in vitro test system are caused by the degradation products of MDI in DMSO, rather than by MDI itself. One of the degradation products of MDI is MDA, which is known to be genotoxic and whose formation was detected when MDI was dissolved in DMSO (Herbold et al., 1998). No MDA could be detected in solutions of MDI in EGDE. It is therefore concluded that the positive results obtained with diisocyanates in DMSO solutions are due to the formation of MDA. The stability of MDI in a model and a real-test environment was studied (Seel et al., 1999). When MDI was dissolved in DMSO, more than 99% of the MDI was degraded before the start of incubation with test ingredients of the Salmonella mutagenicity assay, and MDA was detected at 2.1-2.8% of the MDI concentration within 45 s of incubation. Tests assessing the mutagenic potential of MDI in vitro and in vivo show no convincing evidence of mutagenic activity.

   Female Wistar rats were treated topically (on the back) with 14C-MDI (labelled in the ring) in acetone to investigate the possibility of systemic circulation and DNA-binding potency of MDI (Vock & Lutz, 1997). About 10% of the radioactivity was retained at the site of application. DNA radioactivity in the liver was at the limit of detection. In a second experiment using topical administration, 32P-postlabelling analysis did not reveal isocyanate-DNA adducts in the skin (Vock & Lutz, 1997).

   Tissues obtained from female Wistar rats exposed to a 0.9-ƒΚm aerosol of MDI for 17 h per day, 5 days per week, for 1 year, at levels of 0, 0.3, 0.7, or 2.0 mg/m3, were analysed for DNA adducts using a 32P-postlabelling method (Vock et al., 1996). In the lung, neither isocyanate adducts nor the arylamine adduct was detectable. The same negative result was seen in the liver, bladder, kidney, respiratory epithelium, and peripheral lymphocytes. In the olfactory epithelium, on the other hand, the arylamine-derived DNA adduct nucleotides were detected at very low levels (5-10 adducts per 1010 nucleotides).

References

EAndersen M, Bineru ML, Kiel P, Larsen H, Maxild J (1980) Mutagenic action of isocyanates used in the production of polyurethanes. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 6: 221-226.
EGahlmann R (1993) A critical review for the International Isocyanate Institute. June 1993. Wuppeltal, Bayer AG, Institute for Toxicology.
EHerbold B (1980a) [MDI Salmonella/microsome test for investigation of point mutation activity.] Wuppeltal, Bayer AG (unpublished; Bayer Report No. 9130, 9.5.1980) (in German).

EHerbold B (1980b) [MDI Salmonella/microsome test for investigation of point mutation activity.] Wuppeltal, Bayer AG (unpublished; Bayer Report No. 9341, 1.8.1980) (in German).
EHerbold B, Haas P, Seel K, Walber U (1998) Studies on the effect of the solvents dimethylsulfoxide and ethyleneglycoldimethylether on the mutagenicity of four types of diisocyanates in the Salmonella/microsome test. Mutation research, 412: 167-175.
EHerbold B (1990a) Special study, Salmonella/microsome test with Desmodur 44v20 using TA100. Wuppeltal, Bayer AG (unpublished; Bayer Report No. 19561, 27.9.1990).
EHerbold B (1990b) Special study, Salmonella/microsome test with Desmodur 44M (4,4f-MDI) using TA100. Wuppeltal, Bayer AG (unpublished; Bayer Report No. 19570, 27.9.1990).
ESeel K, Walber U, Herbold B, Kopp R (1999) Chemical behaviour of seven aromatic diisocyanates (toluenediisocyanates and diphenylmethanediisocyanates) under in vitro conditions in relationship to their results in the Salmonella/microsome test. Mutation research, 438:109?123.
EShimizu H, Suzuki Y, Takemura N, Goto S, Matsushita H (1985) The results of microbial mutation test for forty-three industrial chemicals. Sangyo Igaku (Japanese journal of industrial health), 27:400?417.

EVock EH, Hoymann HG, Heinrich U, Lutz WK (1996) 32P-postlabeling of a DNA adduct derived from 4,4f-methylenedianiline in the olfactory epithelium of rats exposed by inhalation to 4,4f-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate. Carcinogenesis, 17(5): 1069-1073.
EWoolrich PF (1982) Toxicology, industrial hygiene and medical control of TDI, MDI and PMPPI. American Industrial Hygiene Association journal, 43: 89-97
EZeiger E (1987) Salmonella mutagenicity test: III. Result from testing of 225 chemicals. Environmental mutagenesis, 9(9) :1-110.

US-NTP Genotoxicity ScreeningF
 
› Ames TestF
 
œ 4,4'-Dioctyldiphenylamine@i4,4'-ƒWƒIƒNƒ`ƒ‹ƒWƒtƒFƒjƒ‰ƒ~ƒ“j
@@@101-67-7 @Industry@@ 393.72
CA CHL/IU Max ( 0.5 mg/ml, -S9), 24-48h
 
1)
1) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)

œ 1,4- Dioxane i1,4-ƒWƒIƒLƒTƒ“jip-ƒWƒIƒLƒTƒ“;@1,4-ƒWƒGƒ`ƒŒƒ“ƒWƒIƒLƒVƒhA@ƒWƒGƒ`ƒŒƒ“ƒG[ƒeƒ‹j
@@@123-91-1@@Industry/Solvent@@ 88.11
AM Sal. Max ( 0.1 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
AM Sal./E. coli Max ( 50.0 mg/plate, }S9j; also negative for 50% vapour    2)
AM Sal. Max ( 10 mg/plate, }S9)   3)
AM Sal./E. coli Max ( 5 mg/plate, }S9   4)
YM S. cerevisiae Max ( 4.75 ƒΚg/plate), -S9)
 
5)
UDS Rat/Hepatocytes Max ( 1M, -S9)
 
1)
CT BALB/3T3 Min ( 2 ƒΚg/plate, -S9) › 6)
CA CHO Max ( 10 mg/plate, }S9)   7)
CA CHO Max ( 5 mg/ml,  -S9)   4)
SCE CHO Min ( 10 mg/plate, -S9) › 7)
SCE CHO Max ( 5 mg/ml, }S9)   4)
DNA E. coli Max ( 1.1 mg/plate,  }S9)
 
8)
MLA Y5178Y Max ( 5.0 mg/plate)   4, 9 )
MN CHO Max ( 5.0 mg/plate)   4)
MNv Mice, liver Min ( 2.0 g/kg, or ) › 4)
MNv Mice, BM Max ( 1.8 g/kg, or )   10)
MNv Mice, Peri. lym. Max ( 3.0 g/kg, or )   4)
SLRLv Drosophila Max ( 35000 ppm, fed )   11)
DNAv Rat hepatocytes Min ( 2.5 g/kg x 2 ) › 12)
UDSv Rat hepatocytes Max ( 1.0%, or ), for 8d   13)
1) Stott WT, et al,: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol, 60, 287-300 (1981)
2) Ministry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.), Suppl. 2,  pp. 57 (2000) (Tables in EnglishI
3) Haworth S., et al., Environ. Mutaagen., Suppl. 1, 3-142 (1981)
4) Morita T & Hayashi M., Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 32, 269-280 (1998)
5) Zimmerman FK, et al,: Mutation Res., 149, 339-351 (1985)
6) Sheu CW., et al., Environ. Mol., Mutagen., 11, 41-48 (1998)
7) Galloway SM., et al., Environ Mol. Mutagen., 10, Suppl.. 10, 1-175 (1987)
8) Hellmer L & Bolcsfoldi, G., Mutation Res., 272, 145-160 (1992)
9) McGregor DB., et al., Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 17, 196-219 (1991)
10) Tinwell H & Ashby J., Mutation Res., 322, 141-150 (1994)
11) Yoon JD., et al., Mutagenesis, 7, 349-367 (1985)
12) Kitchin KT., et al., Cancer Letter., 53, 67-71 (1990)
13) Goldsworthy TL, et al,: Arch. Toxicol., 65, 1-9 (1991)

 
US-NTP Genotoxicity ScreeningF
› Ames TestF
 
› MLA@TestF 
› SCE Test with CHO CellsF@›w
› CA Test with CHO CellsF@ 
› SLRL in DrosophilaF@ 
@
IARC Carcinogenicity CriteriaF
 Group 2B
(Possibly carcinogenic in humans)

yNotez (Cited from IARC Monograph, Suppl., 6 (1987)
@@No data were available on the genetic and related effects of this compound in humans.
@@It induced DNA strand breaks in rat hepatocytes in vitro. It did not induce SLRL mutation in Drosophila or aneuploidy in yeast. It induced CAs in plants but it was not mutagenic to bacteria.@

œ Dioxathion
iƒWƒIƒLƒTƒ`ƒIƒ“j@@@
@@@ 78-34-2@@Pesticide@@ 456.54

@ @ @@
@US-NTP Genotoxicity ScreeningF
@› Ames Test F@
›
@
› MLA (L-5178Y)F@ 
@› ‚r‚b‚d@‚s‚…‚“‚”@‚—‚‰‚”‚ˆ@‚b‚g‚n@‚b‚…‚Œ‚Œ‚“F@›
@
› CA Test with CHO CellsF@ 

œ Dipentene dimer iƒWƒeƒ“ƒyƒ“ƒ_ƒCƒ}[j
@@@57912-86-4@@@@ 136.24
CA CHL/IU Max ( 4.0 mg/ml, }S9), 6-18h
 
1)
1) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998)   (Tables in English)

œ Diphacinone iƒ„ƒ\ƒWƒIƒ“j
@@
82-66-6 @Pesticide@ 340.4
REC B. subtilis Max ( 2.0 m‚‡/disk)
 
1)
AM Sal. /E. coli Max ( 1.0 m‚‡/plate)
 
2)
1) Otsuka Yakuhin Co. Ltd., J. Pesticide Sci., 17, S319-S321 (1992)

œ Diphenylamine iƒWƒtƒFƒ“ƒ‹ƒAƒ~ƒ“j(N,N'-diphenylamin; N-phenylaniline; N-phenylbennzeneamine)@@
@@@@122-39-4@iIndustry / Antioxidantj@@ 169.23
AM Sal. Max ( 0.5 m‚‡/plate, }S9)
 
1)
AM Sal. Max ( 0.3 m‚‡/plate, }S9)   2)
AM Sal. Max (?), }S9   3-8)
AM Sal. (TA98) Min (?), +S9, +Norhalman) › 9)
AM E. coli Max (?), }S9   7)
MLA L5178Y Max (9 ƒΚM), }S9)   10)
HMA Sal./Mice Max (?), ip   11)
MB Yeast Max (?), }S9   12)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.024 mg/ml, -S9), 24h, D20= 0.042; TR= 270 › 13)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 0.1 mg/ml, }S9), 6-18h   14)
DNA E. coli Max (?), }S9   12)
UDS Mouse hepatocytes Max (?), }S9
 
7)
UM E. coli Max (?), }S9   15)
MNv Mice, BM Max ( 1.5 g/kg, or )   16)
CAv Rats, BM Max ( 5 mg/kg/d,  or)   17)
SCEv Mice, BM Max ( 0.5 g/kg,  ip )   18)
1) Ishidate MJr (Ed): Data Book for Mutagenicity Tests on Chemicals in Bacteria, LIC/Tokyo (1991) (Tables in English)
2) Lawlor T., et al. (Unpublished), Hazleton Washington Inc, USA., Rep. No. 14902-0-401 (1992)
3) McGregor DB., et al., Environ. Mutagen., 2, 531-541 (1980)
4) Flolin I., et al., Toxicicol., 15, 219-232 (1980)
5) Babish JG., et al., J. Toxicol. Environ Health, 11, 167-177 (1983)
6) Epler JL., et al., Environ. Health, Perspect., 27, 11-20 (1977)
7) Probst GS., et al., Environ. Mutagen., 3, 11-32 (1981)
8) Zeiger E., et al., Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 11, Suppl..12, 1-157 (1988)
9) Sugimura T., et al., Adv. Exp. Med., Biol., 136B, 1011-1025 (1982)
10) Amacher DESC., et al., Mutation Res., 72, 447-474 (1980)
11) Braun R., et al., Cancer Res., 37, 4572-4579 (1977))
12) McGregor DB., et al., Environ. Mutagen., 2, 531-541 (1980)
13) Ministry of labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.), Suppl. 3,  pp.249 (2005) (Tables in EnglishI
14) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998)   (Tables in English)
15) Von der Hude W., et al., Mutation Res., 203, 81-94 (1988)
16) Murli H., et al., (Unpublished), Hazleton Washington Inc, USA., Rep. No. 14902-0-455 (1992)
17) Korolev AA., et al., Gig. Sanit., 21-25 (in Russian) (1976)
18) Vasil'eva LN., et al., Gig. Tr. Prof. Zabol., 8, 16-19 (1985)

@US-NTP Genotoxicity ScreeningF
@› Ames Test F@
 

œ@Diphenyl cresyl phosphate
i
ƒŠƒ“Ž_ƒWƒtƒFƒjƒ‹ ƒNƒŒƒVƒ‹j
@@@@@26444-49-5 @Industry@ 340.33
AM Sal./E. coli Max ( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
CA CHL/IU (Purity: 41.9%); Max ( 0.043 mg/ml, +S9), 6-18h
’
1)
MNv Mice/BM Max ( 1.25 g/kg, po) 24h
 
2)
1) Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare, Japan (Ed): Toxicity Testing Reports of Environ. Chemicals,@Vol. 2 (1995) (Tables in English)
2) Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare, Japan (Ed): Toxicity Testing Reports of Environ. Chemicals, Vol. 4 (1996) (Tables in English)

œ Diphenyl 2-ethylhexyl phosphateiƒŠƒ“Ž_(2-ƒGƒ`ƒ‹ƒwƒLƒVƒ‹) ƒWƒtƒFƒjƒ‹-ƒGƒXƒeƒ‹j
@@@
1241-94-7@ @Industry@ 362.44
AM Sal./E. coli Max ( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 0.1 mg/ml, +S9), 6-18h
 
1)
1) Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare, Japan (Ed): Toxicity Testing Reports of Environ. Chemicals, Vol. 5 (1997) (Tables in English)

œ 1,3-Diphenylguanidine i1,3-ƒWƒtƒFƒjƒ‹ƒOƒAƒjƒWƒ“j
@@@102-06-7@ Industry@ 211.26
AM Sal./E. coli Max ( 2.5 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1, 2)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 0.4 mg/ml, +S9), 6-18h
 
1)
1) Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare, Japan (Ed): Toxicity Testing Reports of Environ. Chemicals, @Vol. 8 (1) (2001)
2) Ministry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.. JETOC (Ed.), pp. 111 (1996) (in Japanese)

œ
4,4'- Dipehylmethane diisocyanate
@@
101-68-8 @Industry @@ 250.26
AM Sal. Max (?)
 
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 3.0 m‚‡/ml, }S9), 6-18h
’
2)
1) Natil Inst. of Hygien. Sci., Tokyo, Japan (?)
2) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test in vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998)   (Tables in English)

œ
N,N'-Diphenylnitrosoamine (N,N'-ƒWƒtƒFƒjƒ‹ƒjƒgƒƒTƒ~ƒ“j (See also N-5)
@@@@ 86-30-6 @Labouratory @@ 198.22
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.05 m‚‡/ml, +S9), 6h@D20= 0.059



1,)

1) Ministry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.. JETOC (Ed.), Suppl. pp. 264 (1997) (Tables in English)

œ N,N'-Diphenyl-p-phenylenediamine (p-Dianilinobenzene)
@@
74-31-7@ Industry @@ 260.34
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.0037 m‚‡/ml, -S9), 24h@D20= 0.0049; TR= 17000



1, 2,)

CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.0075 m‚‡/ml, -S9), 48h@D20= 0.0067; TR= 3700  3,)
1) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998)   (Tables in English)
2) Sofuni T, et al, Mutation Res., 241, 175-213 (1990)
3) Ministry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.. JETOC (Ed.), .(1996) (Tables in English)

œ Dipropylnitrosamine (DPN) @iƒWƒvƒƒsƒ‹ƒjƒgƒƒTƒ~ƒ“j (See also N-5)
@@@621-64-7@Labouratory@ 130.19
AM Sal. Min (?)
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.2 mg/ml, +S9), 3-21hG@D20= 0.79; TR= 45
›
2)
1) Natl. Inst. Hygien. Sci., Tokyo ?@
2) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)

œ Diquat@iƒWƒNƒI[ƒgj
@@@
2764-72-9@@@Herbicide@@260.34
MB T4-phage Max (?)
 
1)
YM S. cerevisiae Min (?)
›
2)
UDS Human cells (SV-40 transformation) , Min (?)
›
2)
DLv Mice Max (?)
 
2)
‚PjSignami M. & Crebelli R.: Toxicol. Lett. 3, 169-175 (1979)
2) Benigni M., et al.: Mutation Res., 68, 183-193(1979)

œTop Page@iƒgƒbƒvƒy[ƒWj
œAbbreviation @iΘ—ͺ‹L†j@
œMutagenicity i•ΟˆΩŒ΄«j
œTest Systems@(ŽŽŒ±–@‚ΜŽν—ށj
œTechnical Problems@i‹Zp“I–β‘θ“_j
œList of@Compoundsi‰»‡•¨ƒŠƒXƒgj
œEvaluation of Results@iŽŽŒ±Œ‹‰Κ‚Μ•]‰Ώj